Lindenberg, S. (1986). The paradox of privatization in consumption. In paradoxical effects of social behavior(pp. 297-310). Physica-Verlag HD.
Most everyday goods can be more or less private in consumption. For example, a family may share one bathroom or may enjoy the luxury of one bathroom per person in which case the good has been completely privatized. Even such “personal” goods as haircuts may be shared in the sense that family members take turns getting a haircut rather than having their hair cut whenever ...



![[연구참여자 모집/사례 지급] 자유연상 패턴과 심리적 속성 간의 관계 탐색](https://www.happyfinder.co.kr/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/워드프레스_연구참여자모집-360x180.png)








![[센터장 인사말] 서울대학교 행복연구센터의 센터장 최인철입니다.](https://www.happyfinder.co.kr/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/greetings-120x86.png)

![Vol.70 [행복달력] MAY Happiness Calendar](https://www.happyfinder.co.kr/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/5월_행복달력_커버페이지-1-120x86.png)




