페이지 322 – 서울대학교 행복연구센터

Helliwell, J. F. (2006). Well‐being, social capital and public policy: what& #39;s new?. The Economic Journal, 116(510), C34-C45.

This article summarises recent empirical research on the determinants of subjective well‐being. Results from national and international samples suggest that measures of social capital, including especially the corollary measures of specific and general trust, have substantial effects on well‐being beyond those flowing through economic channels. Cross‐national samples (supported by parallel analysis of suicide data) show large well‐being effects from the quality of government. Finally, using well‐being data to estimate the income‐equivalents non‐financial aspects of the workplace produces numbers so large as to suggest the existence of unexploited opportunities to improve both employee satisfaction and enterprise efficiency.

Helliwell, J. F. (2006). Well‐being, social capital and public policy: what’s new?. The Economic Journal, 116(510), C34-C45.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01074.x

O’Sullivan, A. (1993). Voluntary auctions for noxious facilities: incentives to participate and the efficiency of siting decisions.

This paper explores the efficiency properties of a voluntary auction under which the city submitting the low bid hosts the region′s noxious facility and receives the high bid as compensation. In the Nash equilibrium of the auction game, the auction mechanism is individually rational (participation is rational for all values of the local environmental costs of the facility), incentive-compatible (the facility is located in the low-cost city), and revenue-neutral. If the compensation of the host city distorts location choices, participation in the auction is rational for all values of local environmental costs if the scale economies associated with the noxious facility are large relative to the average local environmental cost and the distortionary cost per dollar of compensation.

O’Sullivan, A. (1993). Voluntary auctions for noxious facilities: incentives to participate and the efficiency of siting decisions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 25(1), S12-S26.

https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1993.1030

Frey, B. S., &Oberholzer-Gee, F. (1997). The cost of price incentives: An empirical analysis of motivation crowding-out. The American economic review, 87(4), 746-755.

초록 없음

Frey, B. S., &Oberholzer-Gee, F. (1997). The cost of price incentives: An empirical analysis of motivation crowding-out. The American economic review, 87(4), 746-755.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/2951373

Oberholzer-Gee, F., Frey, B. S., Hart, A., &Pommerehne, W. W. (1995). Panik, Protest und Paralyse Eine empirische Untersuchung über nukleare Endlager in der Schweiz.

This paper deals with the question how to locate generally beneficial, but locally harmful facilities in accordance with citizens’ procedural preferences. The analysis of survey data collected among people potentially affected by such siting decisions shows that aspects of procedural fairness matter most when finding a site for a locally unwanted disamenity. Procedures including elements of auctions turn out to be unpopular, whereas granting authority to the affected community is approved by a large majority.

Oberholzer-Gee, F., Frey, B. S., Hart, A., &Pommerehne, W. W. (1995). Panik, Protest und Paralyse Eine empirische Untersuchung über nukleare Endlager in der Schweiz. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), 131(II), 147-177.

Alm, J., McClelland, G. H., &Schulze, W. D. (1992). Why do people pay taxes?. Journal of public Economics, 48(1), 21-38.

Why do people pay taxes when they have an opportunity, even an incentive, to evade? The experimental results in this paper suggest that tax compliance occurs because some individuals overweight the low probability of audit, although such overweighting is not universal. The results also indicate that compliance does not occur simply because individuals believe that evasion is wrong, since subject behavior is unchanged by the use of either neutral or loaded terms. Finally, there is evidence that individuals pay taxes because they value the public goods that their taxes finance. In short, individuals exhibit much diversity in their behavior.

Alm, J., McClelland, G. H., &Schulze, W. D. (1992). Why do people pay taxes?. Journal of public Economics, 48(1), 21-38.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(92)90040-M

Pommerehne, W. W., &Weck-Hannemann, H. (1996). Tax rates, tax administration and income tax evasion in Switzerland.

This paper contains an empirical analysis of income tax noncompliance in Switzerland, based on the standard model of tax evasion. Noncompliance is found to be positively related to the marginal tax burden and negatively to the probability of audit, though the latter impact is only weak. There is no evidence of a significant deterrent effect of the penalty tax. The extended model reveals that noncompliance is positively related to inflation. Finally, noncompliance is significantly lower when citizens/taxpayers have direct control over government budgets, whereas the opposite holds when there is no such control.

Pommerehne, W. W., &Weck-Hannemann, H. (1996). Tax rates, tax administration and income tax evasion in Switzerland. Public Choice, 88(1-2), 161-170.

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00130416

Cohen-Charash, Y., &Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 86(2), 278-321.

The correlates of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice were examined using 190 studies samples, totaling 64,757 participants. We found the distinction between the three justice types to be merited. While organizational practices and outcomes were related to the three justice types, demographic characteristics of the perceiver were, in large part, unrelated to perceived justice. Job performance and counterproductive work behaviors, considered to be outcomes of perceived justice, were mainly related to procedural justice, whereas organizational citizenship behavior was similarly predicted by distributive and procedural justice. Most satisfaction measures were similarly related to all justice types. Although organizational commitment and trust were mainly related to procedural justice, they were also substantially related to the other types of justice. Findings from laboratory and field studies are not always in agreement. Future research agendas are discussed.

Cohen-Charash, Y., &Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 86(2), 278-321.

https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2958

Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of management, 16(2), 399-432.

The present article chronicles the history of the field of organizational justice, identifies current themes, and recommends new directions for the future. A historical overview of the field focuses on research and theory in the distributive justice tradition (e.g., equity theory) as well as the burgeoning topic of procedural justice. This forms the foundation for the discussion offive popular themes in contemporary organizational justice research: (a) attempts to distinguish procedural justice and distributive justice empirically, (b) the development of new conceptual advances, (c) consideration of the interpersonal determinants of procedural justice judgments, (d) new directions in tests of equity theory, and (e) applications of justice-based explanations to many different organizational phenomena. In closing, a plea is made for future work that improves procedural justice research methodologically (with respect to scope, setting, and scaling), and that attempts to integrate and unify disparate concepts in the distributive and procedural justice traditions.

Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of management, 16(2), 399-432.

https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639001600208

Lind, E. A., Kulik, C. T., Ambrose, M., &de Vera Park, M. V. (1993). Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic.

Two studies examined how litigants’ evaluations of the outcome and process of lawsuits affected their judgments about the fairness of procedures and their acceptance of awards from court-ordered arbitration. The studies tested predictions concerning the operation of a “fairness heuristic”-that procedural justice judgments mediate the effects of process impressions and outcome evaluations on the decision to accept or reject the directives of an authority. Participants in the studies were corporate and individual litigants in federal tort and contract actions that were subject to court-ordered arbitration. In both studies the decision to accept the arbitrator’s award or reject it and go to trial was strongly correlated with judgments of procedural justice, and much or all of the effect of outcome evaluations and process impressions on award acceptance was mediated by procedural justice judgments, which had a stronger effect than either subjective or objective measures of the arbitration award. Separate analyses of corporate and individual decision makers in the second study suggested that both groups relied heavily on procedural justice judgments in deciding whether or not to accept the arbitration award. The findings provide evidence of widespread use of a fairness heuristic and support the extension of justice-judgment research to corporate decision making.

Lind, E. A., Kulik, C. T., Ambrose, M., &de Vera Park, M. V. (1993). Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic. Administrative Science Quarterly,224-251.

DOI: 10.2307/2393412